Skip to main content

FYS: Virtual Worlds and Avatars: the Philosophy of Video Games

Library research tips for Professor Hopkins' FYS
The Philosophy of Computer Games
Cyber Zen: Imagining Authentic Buddhist Identity, Community, and Practices in the Virtual World of Second Life
Gamer Theory
Foundations for Moral Relativism
Ethics in the Virtual World
Electronic Tribes: the virtual worlds of geeks, gamers, shamans, and scammers
The State of Play: law, games, and virtual worlds
Playing with Religion in Digital Games
Hello Avatar: rise of the networked generation
Virtual Embodied: presence/practice/technology
Cyberpunk Women, Feminism and Science Fiction: a critical study
Communities of Play: emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds
Virtual Reality: representations in contemporary media
Storyplaying: agency and narrative in video games
The New Digital Storytelling: creating narratives with new media
Get Real: a philosophical adventure in virtual reality

Start exploring here

Credo is an academic alternative to Wikipedia. It provides access to a significant number of encylopedias related to philosophy and can be a good starting point to explore key concepts.

Search Tip

Think about keywords related to your topic to start your search in the library's WorldCat catalog. When you find a good book, try the "More like this" subject links to find more material.

 

Suggested Databases for Articles

Academic Search Complete is a comprehensive multi-disciplinary full-text database. Start your research for articles here!  Tip #1: View an article's full record to read the abstract, or summary, and quickly decide if it is useful for your research.  Tip #2: Use the subject links from the full record to find additional articles.

JSTOR is a multi-disciplinary database which provides scholarly, full-text content. While coverage goes all the way back to the 19th century, be aware there is no current content for many journals. 

Full-text of hundreds of journals in the humanities, arts, and social sciences from scholarly publishers, mostly university presses. 

Loading

Evaluating websites

Use these criteria to evaluate a website: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose

Currency: the timeliness of the information

  • When was the information published or posted?
  • Has the information been revised or updated?
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic?
  • Are the links functional?

Relevance: the importance of the information for your needs

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
  • Who is the intended audience?
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)?
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use?
  • Would you be comfortable using this source for a research paper?

Authority: the source of the information

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given?
  • What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations?
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic?
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
    • examples: .com (commercial), .edu (educational), .gov (U.S. government), .org (nonprofit organization), or .net (network)

Accuracy: the reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the content

  • Where does the information come from?
  • Is the information supported by evidence?
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
  • Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?
  • Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors?

Purpose: the reason the information exists

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade?
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda?
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
Loading

Turabian (Chicago) Citation Style

Research isn't complete until you correctly cite all your sources. Provide a complete citation to credit the authors / creators of sources you used, and to let your paper's reader locate and verify these sources. 

Turabian Quick Guide covers the basics of Turabian formatting and style. For the most complete information, use the Manual, available in the Research Commons and on Reserve.